The Cambridge Road Estate in Norbiton has been a building site for several years now, and it is going to remain one for a long time yet. Kingston Council's flagship regeneration project — one of the largest council estate rebuilds in outer London — has just reached a significant milestone: a planning application for Phase 2 has been submitted.
But with that application come questions that residents, both current and future, deserve straight answers to. Why is the affordable housing offer sitting at 35% when council policy says 50%? What happens to people living on the estate during construction? And how long does all of this actually take?
The Cambridge Road Estate regeneration is not a single project — it is a five-phase programme that will eventually demolish and replace the entirety of the existing estate, delivering a significantly higher number of homes than currently exist on the site.
Phase 1 is already under construction. Groundworks and early building work are visible to anyone walking through the Norbiton area. The first new homes from this phase are expected to be occupied before the wider scheme is complete.
Phase 2 is the newest chapter. A planning application has just been submitted to Kingston Council for 383 new homes. The proposed buildings would rise to up to 13 storeys — a scale that will fundamentally change the skyline of this part of the borough. Phases 3, 4, and 5 will follow in sequence, though detailed applications for those phases are yet to come.
The full timeline stretches well into the 2030s. This is not a short-term inconvenience. For residents currently living on the estate, it is the backdrop to a significant chunk of their lives.
Here is where scrutiny is most needed.
Kingston Council's own planning policy requires new major residential developments to deliver 50% affordable housing. The Phase 2 application proposes 35%.
That is a 15 percentage point gap from policy. On a development of 383 homes, that difference is not trivial. It is the difference between roughly 191 affordable homes and roughly 134 — a shortfall of approximately 57 homes that could, in theory, have been available at social rent or shared ownership.
Council officers and the developer — a partnership involving the council itself through its housing delivery arrangements — will almost certainly argue that 35% is the maximum that the scheme's viability allows. This is a standard defence in London planning, and sometimes it is legitimate. Complex remediation, abnormal construction costs, and financing structures can all reduce what is financially viable.
But residents and planning committee members should be asking to see the viability assessment in full, not just a summary. They should ask whether that assessment has been independently reviewed. And they should ask whether the 35% figure is fixed, or whether a review mechanism is built into the permission — meaning that if the scheme becomes more profitable than projected, the affordable housing percentage increases accordingly.
These are not hostile questions. They are the standard questions any informed resident or scrutiny body should be asking of any major regeneration scheme.
The Cambridge Road Estate is not empty land. People live there now. Many have lived there for decades.
Kingston Council has made commitments around the right to return — the principle that existing secure tenants who are decanted to allow demolition will have the right to move into one of the new homes on the estate when their phase is complete.
The questions residents should be pressing are specific:
None of these questions are answered by a planning application alone. They require scrutiny of the legal agreements — the Section 106 — that will be attached to any planning permission.
Blocks of up to 13 storeys represent a significant change in density for this part of Kingston. That is not automatically a bad thing — more homes are needed, and building up rather than out is often the right approach in a borough where land is scarce.
But density requires infrastructure. Residents should be asking what the Phase 2 application says about:
These details will be in the planning application documents, which are publicly available on Kingston Council's planning portal. They are worth reading.
A planning application is a legal process with formal public consultation built in. Once validated by the council, the Phase 2 application will be open for comment from any member of the public.
You do not need to be a neighbour to object or support a planning application. Any resident of the borough can submit a representation. What matters is that representations are material planning considerations — comments about the principle of development, affordable housing, height, design, transport impact, and community infrastructure. Personal objections to change, or concerns about property values, carry less weight in planning law.
The application will ultimately go before Kingston Council's Planning Committee for a decision. That meeting is held in public. You can attend, and members of the public can sometimes speak.
If you are a current resident of the Cambridge Road Estate, you also have rights beyond the planning process. The council is legally obliged to consult tenants on regeneration proposals that affect their homes. If you feel that consultation has been inadequate, or that commitments made to you have not been honoured, you have the right to raise that formally — through your ward councillor, through the council's housing scrutiny process, or through the Housing Ombudsman if appropriate.
The Cambridge Road Estate regeneration is, in principle, the right kind of project. Replacing poor-quality post-war housing stock with modern, energy-efficient homes, increasing density in a well-connected part of the borough, and — if the commitments are honoured — protecting existing residents through the right to return.
But good intentions and good outcomes are not the same thing. The difference between them is scrutiny: residents, councillors, and journalists asking specific questions and demanding specific answers, not accepting broad assurances in place of hard data.
The affordable housing gap between 35% and the council's own 50% policy requires a clear, evidence-based public explanation. The displacement and right-to-return commitments need to be enforceable and independently monitored. And the infrastructure that 383 new homes will require needs to be funded and delivered — not promised and deferred.
If you live in or near the Cambridge Road Estate, or if you are a Kingston resident who cares about how regeneration is delivered in this borough, now is the time to make your voice heard.
Use Council Clarity to message your ward councillor directly. Ask them where they stand on the 35% affordable housing offer. Ask what the right-to-return guarantee actually says in legal terms. Ask when the Planning Committee will hear this application, and whether they will be attending.
Councillors represent you. Hold them to it.
Share this post
Want to have your say on this issue?
Contact your local councillor through Council Clarity. Your message becomes a public thread.
Message your councillor →Kingston's special educational needs budget is haemorrhaging money — £13.1m overspent in 2025/26 alone. Here's what it means for families navigating the SEND system.
accountabilityFrom road closures to park events and building sites, here is what Kingston Council has planned for summer 2026 — and the questions residents should be asking.
accountabilityKingston residents pay £2,608.12 in Band D council tax in 2026/27. But how does that compare to Richmond and Sutton — and what are you getting for it?